If Soviet communism was an inherently flawed ideology which "collapsed under its own weight," why did it take so many decades of constant opposition from the West (e.g. wars, arms race, political pressure, space race, espionage, etc.) for it to succumb?
The opposition can of course be explained partly by the desire of the West to check the spread of communism (e.g. Afghanistan). But I was struck by the implicit contradiction in what I had been told about communism (that it is inherently flawed and cannot sustain a society) and what our reaction to it was (essentially ensuring that it could not succeed).
Anyway, that just popped into my head. Am I missing something? Does it just take a long time for inherently flawed ideological structures to fail? Or could the Soviet Union have thrived if the West would have laid back? How do we deal with Cuba, China, and Vietnam?
